Tag Archives: society

Tools for being human, part eight: Owning my age

pigs head

My age was a defining characteristic right from the start. Actually, probably before the start, measured really from the moment of conception. Once I was freed of the womb, it was a scale against  which my progress was judged. “Oh, so he isn’t crawling yet? Never mind, maybe he can be a conservative.”

It soon became part of the way I defined myself. “My name is Regan, I can draw an airplane and tie my shoe laces and I am four-and-three-quarters”. It became a ranking system in social situations. The five-year-olds got the toy rifles, those under five made do with sticks or finger-pointing. Though I did learn to draw that Remington two-finger pretty damn quick.

It was age-division that was my first experience of segregation. Specifically the great adult-child divide. At celebrations us children got a lower table, fewer items of cutlery, and higher sugar-content foods. The adults had the taller tables, more complicated social rules, and decisions to make on who would have to drive. I also learnt that certain behaviour, activities and ideologies were restricted to each side. Alcohol, untruths and high-impact cursing were strictly for “the adults”. Imagination, playtime and brutal honesty were the domain of children.

And yet my memories of childhood are largely of sunlight and adventure. I didn’t undergo any of the maturity summoning transformations that some of my peers had to face. My parents never divorced, I didn’t have to raise my siblings, I was neither abused nor abandoned. I got to be a very thorough eight year old, building fortresses from cushions, mown-grass, and imagination. I was a competent ten-year old, earning my scars by playing games of “policemen versus protestors”, riding my BMX off cliffs, and hurling adult-branded curses at bullies. And I became well-versed in the dark arts of teenageism. Blushing around girls, arguing with Dad about the length of my hair, and replacing judicious portions of my parent’s darker spirits with tea.

When I look at a photo of myself on my 21st birthday, I realise that I largely matched society’s age-expectations. I had a peer-inherited (and media enhanced) disregard for authority. I had long hair, and a tattoo with an ungracious story. I left university classes early to play bass guitar in a metal band named Shocker. And I had a Rainman-like ability to calculate the best alcohol-by-volume-by-price in a bottle store. Yip, 94% age-appropriate.

Social pressure remained relentless, if not always overt. I understood that by the age of thirty I should have been married, with a house, and maybe a child on the way. I rebelled. It wasn’t until thirty-one I had a wife and a house. And horses. I had a good, steady job that paid well, but I’d demoted fantasy and imagination, replaced some of my dreams with wants. As a result there was a tension within me, a pull between society’s expectations, and my buried needs. At thirty-three, I imploded. House, home, relationship, job. I didn’t have the emotional maturity to deal with the aftermath. So I boarded a plane.

For the next few years I put myself in situations where I lived, worked and danced with people ten years younger than me. People who labelled their hopes as certainties rather than impracticalities. People who looked for their options on a wide horizon rather than down a narrow tunnel. Ok, some of them pissed in the laundry, shat in the shower or offered loud advice from places of ignorance. But by now I knew that age was no antidote to foolishness. I started to realise that elucidation had to be earned, not granted. So I paid attention to my surroundings.

One of the greatest things about immersing yourself in an unfamiliar community, is that you have a chance of developing empathy, appreciation, understanding. Ageing is an opportunity through which we can build comprehension through experience. What it is like to sit in your first maths lesson. What it means to be afraid of the dark. What it means to be struggling with teenage ideas around gender. Imagine what we might gain if had to live through a range of ethnicities? Or if over our lifetime we gradually shifted gender? What insights and understanding might we draw?

And yet such opportunities might well be squandered. At thirty I believed that the people I could best relate to, were those of my own age. I thought that we’d been born at the best possible time, and that we shared things no other age could understand. Hair metal, misogyny, The Goonies. Besides, society frowns at the idea of inter-age mingling. It represents it as insidious, or inappropriate, or sad. At thirty-three I began to undo my prejudice. As a consequence I spent the next ten years learning my most consequential lessons in humility, creativity, and the development of wisdom, from yoofs.

One of those world-shakers was my girlfriend for much of that time. She taught me the importance of honesty, and honour. Of forgiveness.The difference in our ages wasn’t a problem until a biological alarm shifted her world. Fortunately she’d also taught me enough about self-reflection to avoid immolation, and so I began hosting couch surfers in order to fill a number of voids. And I was surprised to find that one of the most spontaneous, creative and inspirational was a woman just a little older than me. She had endless stories, she’d made beer for years, and she lived in Boulder, Colorado. Like Mork and Mindy (kids my age will get it…). I booked another flight.

She introduced me to a range of wonderful people, people who at forty, or fifty, or sixty, who still had an eye on the horizon. People who didn’t let their age dictate who they should be. People who rather than giving up on their dreams, had chased them down, and then found new ones. And since then I keep finding older-aged heroes.

Ageism is a powerful prejudice, one which build barriers and promotes ignorance. Our societies should promote kinship, not division. And as with anything societal, it is up to me to be part of any change.

So I choose to see age as a choice, not a curse. I can choose to age poorly. Choose a diet designed to challenge my heart and bowels rather than befriend them. Choose to define functional alcoholism my pointing to the one gunt in the pub that’s more pished than I am. Choose to tell myself that a sore back, a beer belly, and a mutually damaging relationship with a girlfriend I’ve taught myself to hate, are all symptoms of too many years, rather than my own poor choices.

Or I can choose to learn every day, to rewrite my prejudices through experience. Choose to summon the vigour and hope of my teens and wrap this around the compassion and care I’ve taken on in my forties. Choose to measure people by the depth of their hugs, the warmth of their smile, and their capacity for enjoyment, rather than the country of their birth, the number of candles on their cake, or their possession (or lack of) a Y-chromosome.

I choose to make (as much as possible) my own choices.

On making decisions about who to help

At times I wonder whether I’m being callous when I decide I’m not going to help with a particular problem or cause. I might have been talking to a Greenpeace champion about fracking in Northern Canada, watching attention-starved children in ‘The Long Way Round’, or walking past an old gent curled up with his ageing Alsatian outside my train station. And I don’t really react, I neither travel to the home of Ice Road Truckers, board a plane for Bucharest, nor buy a hot chocolate for the old fella. I just turn away and let the issue slip down into my sub-conscious, and swallow back the lump of guilt that rises in my throat.

There is a degree of pressure on all of us to recognise the troubles that other people, other species, and our environment are facing. If I read the paper, listen to the news on the radio and check Facebook, I’ll have learnt of a dozen local and global problems by lunch time. How can I ignore so many opportunities to help? Even though all these problems appear to have at least a couple of degrees of separation from me, I feel a compulsion to do something about at least some of them. I can’t do everything though, I can’t save the world, can I? How do I balance genuine care and concern against beating myself up for my inaction?

Lately I’ve begun thinking that the key to my self-improvement might lie in consideration. If I actively think my choices through rather than letting myself operate on some sort of auto-pilot then I tend to make better decisions. More importantly though I also then learn more from each choice I make, I pay more attention to the results and any unforeseen consequences. So what happens when I start making thoughtful decisions on who to help?

A couple of months ago I caught up with a loveable Essex lad I used to cook with. Over several rounds of cider I found that he had made a conscious decision in determining which issues he would tackle. He explained that he didn’t want to appear naive or unconcerned, but that he no longer read newspapers or internet news sites. He had realised he could spend all his waking hours ranting about issues he could never affect, or he could instead spend that time interacting with his workmates, family and friends. He’d chosen to focus just on the people he came into contact with each day. He now has the time and inclination to stop and chat to the upset looking Polish plumber on the way to work. He draws his understanding of the world from those around him and prefers to develop opinions based on first hand experience. I see it as a considered switch to ‘think globally, act locally’, as he deals only with the issues within his own realm, though he has an understanding of how his actions might also affect the wider world.

At the time I liked the idea of consciously limiting my concerns to those closest to me, and fending off those issues that don’t directly affect my relatives, my friends or my neighbours. I thought that if we all simply concentrated in helping those around us then we might also gradually impact the larger issues. But after further consideration I’ve realised that most of us don’t take the time to create our own moral code, and as such I can’t trust that everyone will act in the best interests of anyone beyond themselves. So I think I need to concern myself with the wider ideas as well, the bigger issues.

But being concerned isn’t enough. Nor is just showing concern. A few days after catching up with my British mate I found myself back in my home town chatting to one of my best friends and confidantes. We talked about the frustration of listening to people get fired up on ideas and then never doing anything about them. We focussed on our social responsibilities and found firm agreement on the need to turn the energy we might spend venting anger over an issue into action. Ranting to my friends about the Eastern European slave trade might earn me kudos for being a concerned, informed person but doesn’t really result in anything positive. In fact continual one-sided conversations about the world’s evils results in me acting as an amplifier for fear rather than a catalyst for change. Rather than spending my time repeating what I’ve read on news sites I need to start considering each situation, and then deciding whether I’m actually going to do something about it. If I am horrified to learn that insufficient lighting along university walkways is resulting in woman fearing to attend night classes then I have a choice: I can spread the contagion of dismay through angered conversations about men’s inability to police each other or I can use my spare time to raise money for new lighting. It is so much more positive and rewarding to use the passion born of dismay to plan useful action, rather than to promote society’s failures.

The rewards of deciding to act to help others are many, but just as important as considered action is considered inaction. The by-product of thinking each issue through and determining which to act on, is that I’ve also considered which of them I’m not going to act on. If I have made a mindful decision to contribute to a particular problem then I can discard it without shame rather than simply suppressing thoughts of it. I can then answer to people if they confront me about my inaction, though the only person I ever really need to answer to is myself.

A friend recently introduced me to American writer/activist Colleen Patrick-Goudreau. Colleen has a piece of advice which I think summarises my ideas on being charitable: ‘Don’t do nothing just because you can’t do everything’.

Measuring my advance through life

Owl flight

I’m deep in the Scottish countryside, sitting in a caravan surrounded by thick stone walls, listening to rain tapping the thin metal roof.  I’ve got a stockpile of local cheeses, some freshly brewed coffee, and an intermittent internet connection. It should be a perfect day for working on my book, but it’s always on these relaxed writing days that I end up provoking myself with disturbing thoughts. Today I realised just how much time I’ve spent over the past couple of years trying to figure out if I’m actually achieving anything.

Measuring our progress through life is an interesting if occasionally frustrating pastime. As we pass through our first two to three decades of life we set ourselves targets and goals. Often these are also influenced by our society, our family and our peers. My own personal milestones have been a mixed bag. Some have been somewhat reckless and accidental, like the Hemmingway-esque ‘first loss of a piece of tooth lost in a fight’. Some were dead romantic, I flew from Wellington to Paris to try to rekindle what had been a beautiful relationship with an amazing woman. Sigh. And some were genuinely pitiful, some of you may have read my article about my unicorn tattoo (April 2013, ‘On being the boy with the unicorn tattoo) But they were all significant to me, even I often only realised this after the event.

I’m sure you have all ticked your share of entertaining ‘milestone’ boxes as you’ve thundered through your twenties and thirties. Eventually a range of conditioning tools, from biological to societal, direct us towards a new way to continue measuring our progress through life. Children. These offspring become a sort of living advent calendar, minus the chocolate treat behind each door. The ticking of our clocks becomes synchronised with the beating of their hearts. Their public triumphs become our secret successes. Their transitions through the stages of life become our default method of gauging our worth, our way of determining our position on the path between womb and grave. But what about those of us who don’t have kids? How are we meant to know if we’re getting anywhere?

I never made a definitive choice not to have children, I have just never made a choice to have them. And I guess I’ve never been put in a position where I had no choice, but that’s an article for another day. There’s a willingness in some parts of societies to brand those of us who don’t have children as ‘selfish’, as if there is no other way to contribute to the world. Is this fair though? But as I gallop past my thirties I have to ask myself how I might measure my value to the world, if it’s not through the successes of my offspring. Without the child side of the equation, I could spend the rest of my life trying to figure out ‘why am I here?’, but that would indeed be selfish. Instead I want to kick some positivity back into the universe. If I’m not going to dedicate twenty years (or no doubt more if you ask my Mum and Dad…) to making my children my life’s focus, then I think I should be working towards contributing something else. Otherwise it’s like turning up to a barbeque with just a bottle opener and an eye on the beer fridge.

I hope I have an answer. I think what I need to do as a member of the ‘child free’ is to continually set myself worthy goals. And by worthy, I mean I want each goal to contribute not only to my own growth, but to create something positive for others. When I left New Zealand six months ago, I had two primary goals. Walk five hundred miles across the top of Spain, and write a book. I ended up replacing walking the El Camino de Santiago with a series of other adventures. But the other goal, the writing, that’s the way I can see myself creating something unique. I’m hoping my stories will inspire, entertain and educate. I need to focus on that goal for the moment, the less selfish one. I’ve learnt a lot about myself over the past eighteen months, and just occasionally I’ve been able to use my experiences to offer help others to understand their own problems. I’m hoping to reach a larger audience with my blog, and then eventually more people still with my books.

So if I never end up having children to pass my goals onto, I believe that if I continue to use my talents to contribute to other people’s lives then I am still valuable. And I’ll get to play the eccentric Uncle who’s always returning from strange foreign lands with barely believable stories, and creepy souvenirs.

Oh, and I will walk that damn pilgrims’ road one day. Maybe next year, before I start the next book.

 

On trying to be different versus trying to be the same

58545_440049828552_6008108_n

As a young lad I once read something about how difficult (impossible?) it was to have a “free and independent thought.” This became an unmeasurable goal. I’d squint my eyes, push hard and come up with a thought, and then I’d examine it to try to determine where I might have derived it from. This introverted pastime soon merged with a wider desire to do things differently. Think Natalie Portman’s character in “Garden State”. From taking random missteps as I walked down the driveway at home, to making up new words each day (complete with pygmy clicks and space whale groans…), I set myself up to be a perpetual victim throughout my younger years. Fortunately I was socially adjusted (or societally adjusted?) enough to keep a little of this under the radar. Ginger lad plus imaginary friends equals a lifetime spotting locomotives and collecting other peoples cats.

Many years later I proudly explained to Kara (the anarchist-Canadian) that I’d spent my life attempting to think differently to anyone else, to come up with thoughts and ideas that few had considered before. She replied that this was the first serious thing that we didn’t have in common. She’d spent her life trying to find was in which she thought like the rest of the world. And on inspection I realised that was the truly different one in our particular and peculiar relationship. Oh shit.

So my attempts to separate myself from the crowd have at times been a little pretentious. But I honestly find that in many ways I struggle to fit the mould society shapes for its citizens. Just after University (now there’s a while other blog topic…) I flirted with the idea of fulfilment through acquisition,  the quest for happiness through stuff. Despite “Religion 201: An Introduction to Buddhism.” But it wasn’t for me. I found that I could fit all the things I needed to live happily in a 60 litre backpack. I’m content with photos of me with friends, music, and a notebook with enough free pages for me to sketch a characterful face, or write of my feelings for someone five thousand miles away. And though I love the cosy feeling of a home, I feel a constant urge to discover new lands and experiences. I dreamt of visiting Ireland from a very young age. And since discovering a slice of cold pizza and a “welcome, I’m upstairs downing Guinness” note from my sister in a backpackers on my arrival in Dublin, I decided to always set my sites on a new destination. That’s grown into an ever changing wish list of new destinations. Most governments build their structures around an ageing idea of everyone settling in one spot for their existence. But nomadism is back on the rise my friends.

On those years that I’m back in New Zealand I also find myself struggling with the concept of a “polite society”. The unwritten rules whereby we avoid inflammatory conversational topics, the “not talking religion, politics or trans-gender operations” at the dinner table. Recently I explained to a small group of people I didn’t know, that I was “line blind”, so they would have to excuse me when I frequently over-stepped it. Of course I know, I just don’t often choose to care. I don’t like the idea of restricting conversations based on minimising the chance of a difference of opinion. It prevents us from having our less worthy ideas and beliefs challenged. If you abide by all this convention, you’ll end up recycling the same 38 “ideal adult conversations” repeatedly between the ages of 24 and 67. So try not to ask me about the weather, or “how I know Judy” when we meet for the first time. Instead, ask me if I’m as aloof as I appear, or whether I think buddha could take Jesus in a UFC matchup.

There are deeper, more difficult differences within this boy, which I’ll discuss in the near future, but I know now that differentiation may well be the rule rather than the exception. I’ve met enough people from a variety of backgrounds to realise how important it is not to think I have the monopoly on new ideas. I’ve been humbled by the sheer variety of experiences I’ve had related to me. Many of situations and upbringings that others have endured have been uncomfortable to listen to, they’ve brought tears to my eyes and rage to my heart. These people sometimes emerge stronger, and more capable. But it’s not all happy endings, sometimes they’re left terrifyingly damaged. So now I’m disappointed by those who dramatise the difficulties they face, which endanger only their pride, or their societal standing. But all of these encounters help me understand myself, and as someone who wants to share stories of outlandish lives, they are an essential part of my education.

I think the one thing that is important, is that we take the time to understand each others differences, and to learn of other ways to live. It is intolerance and ignorance that conspire to push many of us to the fringes. I hope that eventually my writing will help at least a few people understand the value in living differently.